In a supercritical CO₂ (scCO₂) environment, changes in the molecular conformation of sodium methallyl sulfonate (SMAS)

In a supercritical CO₂ (scCO₂) environment, changes in the molecular conformation of sodium methallyl sulfonate (SMAS)

In a supercritical CO₂ (scCO₂) environment, changes in the molecular conformation of sodium methallyl sulfonate (SMAS) — such as folding and ionic aggregation as discussed earlier — directly affect its key properties, including chemical reactivity, solubility, and interfacial behavior. These changes, in turn, determine its applicability in relevant applications. The following analysis explores the impacts from specific performance dimensions:

1. Impact on Solubility: Conformational Adjustments Exacerbate Poor Solubility

The conformational changes of SMAS are closely linked to its solubility in scCO₂. ScCO₂ itself is a low-polarity solvent (with a dielectric constant of approximately 1.5–2.5), while the sulfonate group (-SO₃Na) of SMAS is highly polar and ionic, making it difficult to solvate effectively in scCO₂.

  • “Self-shielding” effect of folded conformations: SMAS folds to bring the sulfonate group closer to the hydrophobic methallyl chain, which reduces direct contact between the polar group and scCO₂ but does not resolve the fundamental polarity mismatch. Conversely, folding may result in a more uneven distribution of molecular polarity, further reducing compatibility with scCO₂.
  • Impact of ionic aggregation: Intermolecular ionic pairing of sulfonate groups (bridged by Na⁺) due to poor solvation forms larger aggregates. These aggregates, with greater volume and polarity than monomeric molecules, are even less soluble in scCO₂.
    Outcome: SMAS is inherently poorly soluble in scCO₂, and conformational changes (folding and aggregation) exacerbate this issue, potentially causing precipitation or sedimentation in scCO₂ systems. This limits its uniform dispersion as an additive (e.g., as an inhibitor or surface modifier).

2. Impact on Chemical Reactivity: Conformational Restrictions Reduce Reactivity

The chemical reactivity of SMAS primarily depends on its active sites — particularly the double bond in the allyl group (CH₂=C(CH₃)-), which readily undergoes polymerization or functional group modification. Conformational changes affect this reactivity through steric hindrance or electronic effects:

  • Steric hindrance from folded conformations: When SMAS folds, the distance between the sulfonate group and the double bond decreases, potentially creating a steric shield around the double bond. This hinders the access of reactants (e.g., free radical initiators) to the double bond, reducing polymerization rates. For example, in free radical polymerization in scCO₂, folded conformations may lower the copolymerization activity of SMAS.
  • Electronic effects of ionic aggregation: Intermolecular ionic aggregation (e.g., dimer formation via Na⁺ bridging) can alter the electron density of the double bond. The strong electron-withdrawing nature of sulfonate groups, if transmitted to the double bond through folding or aggregation, reduces electron density at the double bond, making it less susceptible to electrophilic attack and further inhibiting reactivity.
    Outcome: Conformational changes may reduce the chemical reactivity of SMAS, particularly impairing reaction efficiency and selectivity in reactions involving the double bond.

3. Impact on Interfacial Behavior: Enhanced Hydrophobicity Alters Adsorption Capacity

At interfaces between scCO₂ and other phases (e.g., liquid or solid interfaces such as scCO₂-water or scCO₂-rock interfaces), conformational changes in SMAS significantly affect its adsorption behavior and interfacial activity:

  • Hydrophobicity-driven interfacial orientation: In scCO₂, the methallyl chain of SMAS, with enhanced hydrophobicity, tends to extend, while the sulfonate group is partially shielded by folding. This conformation increases overall molecular hydrophobicity, making SMAS more prone to adsorb at interfaces between scCO₂ and polar phases (e.g., aqueous phases). It orients with the hydrophobic chain inserted into the scCO₂ phase and the partially exposed sulfonate group facing the polar phase.
  • Restricted interfacial spreading of aggregates: Ionic aggregates of SMAS, due to their large size, cannot spread uniformly at interfaces, potentially forming local agglomerations and weakening their ability to regulate interfacial tension. In contrast, in aqueous environments, SMAS dissolves and extends fully, readily forming a monomolecular layer at interfaces to efficiently reduce interfacial tension.
    Outcome: Conformational changes reduce the interfacial activity of SMAS in scCO₂ systems, impairing its ability to stabilize interfaces or regulate interfacial tension. This is disadvantageous for applications such as scCO₂-enhanced oil recovery (as an oil-displacing agent) or scCO₂ extraction (as a surfactant).

4. Impact on Dispersion Stability: Aggregation Causes Instability in Dispersed Systems

When SMAS is used in dispersed systems in scCO₂ (e.g., dispersing nanoparticles or stabilizing emulsions), aggregation induced by conformational changes undermines dispersion stability:

  • “Bridging” effect of aggregates: Ionic aggregates of SMAS may form large polar cores, which attract other polar particles in the system (e.g., hydroxyl groups on nanoparticle surfaces) through polar interactions, leading to particle agglomeration.
  • Insufficient steric hindrance: Folded conformations prevent SMAS chains from extending fully, making it difficult to form an effective steric barrier on the surface of dispersed phases, thus failing to prevent collision and aggregation of dispersed particles.
    Outcome: SMAS struggles to function as a dispersant in scCO₂; instead, its aggregation may exacerbate instability in dispersed systems.

Summary

In a supercritical CO₂ environment, the conformational changes of SMAS (such as folding and ionic aggregation) represent adaptations to the low-polarity, weakly solvating environment. However, these changes have multiple negative impacts on its performance: reduced solubility hinders dispersion, decreased chemical reactivity limits reaction efficiency, weakened interfacial activity impairs interface regulation, and aggregation disrupts dispersion stability. These effects significantly restrict the application of SMAS in scCO₂ systems (e.g., as a functional monomer or additive). To improve its performance, chemical modification (e.g., introducing scCO₂-philic groups such as fluorocarbon chains) may be required to regulate its conformation and enhance compatibility with scCO₂.


Please tell us your needs



More Products

More Related Content